Remove libressl tag from README

[CI SKIP]
This commit is contained in:
Joe Groocock 2018-09-05 14:22:48 +01:00
parent 6eb5c1e704
commit f4877b1283
Signed by: frebib
GPG Key ID: E0B16BEACFBB6A86

View File

@ -22,18 +22,11 @@ Additionally, the following small utilities have been included for convenience a
- su-exec - _A convenient utility for changing user and dropping privilege_ | https://github.com/frebib/su-exec - su-exec - _A convenient utility for changing user and dropping privilege_ | https://github.com/frebib/su-exec
- tini - _A tiny but valid `init` for containers_ | https://github.com/krallin/tini - tini - _A tiny but valid `init` for containers_ | https://github.com/krallin/tini
## Supported tags and respective `Dockerfile` links
There are two main streams of this image: with and without LibreSSL. You can find the dockerfiles below
* `1.0`, `latest` - [(master/dockerfile)](https://github.com/spritsail/busybox/blob/master/Dockerfile)
* `1.0-libressl`, `libressl` - [(libressl/dockerfile)](https://github.com/spritsail/busybox/blob/libressl/Dockerfile)
## Goals for a base image ## Goals for a base image
Occasionally there are opportunities where alternative standard libc implementations ([musl][musl]/[uclibc][uclibc]) won't do, like in the case of [proprietary](http://i.imgur.com/V5K7N1I.jpg) software like [Plex Media Server](https://www.plex.tv/downloads/) where only pre-compiled binaries are provided which were built against the common glibc library. Occasionally there are opportunities where alternative standard libc implementations ([musl][musl]/[uclibc][uclibc]) won't do, like in the case of [proprietary](http://i.imgur.com/V5K7N1I.jpg) software like [Plex Media Server](https://www.plex.tv/downloads/) where only pre-compiled binaries are provided which were built against the common glibc library.
(_If your use-case doesn't require glibc and you can compile the program from source, we strongly recommend you use the [Alpine Linux](https://hub.docker.com/\_/alpine) image, based on musl, which is smaller and features a full packaging system_) (_If your use-case doesn't require glibc and you can compile the program from source, we strongly recommend you use the [Alpine Linux](https://github.com/spritsail/alpine) image, based on musl, which is smaller and features a full packaging system_)
- The image had to be _small_, whilst still being fully functional - The image had to be _small_, whilst still being fully functional
- It should contain a full GNU glibc implementation to support pre-compiled binaries - It should contain a full GNU glibc implementation to support pre-compiled binaries